Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
Categories

31
Foursqualor
by FeedbackOne threat to a check-in service governed by users is digital litter. For instance, it used to be when you wanted to mark your location on a social network such as Foursquare that you’d get listings of places such as “Seat 23A” or “this rocking chair on the porch.” That’s still the case, but it’s much less frequent in the United States; overseas, however, it could be a big problem in the United Kingdom, where Foursquare is just now starting to emerge. Feedback’s Dean Browell outlines the threat of what he calls “Foursqualor” on iMedia Connection:
In London, however, this issue seems to be worse as the general population interested in potentially using Foursquare is far more diverse. In the U.S., you were dealing with a savvy first-mover who didn’t mind (and potentially relished) the clean-up and pruning while the general public gave Foursquare a chance after many of the corrections had been made. In the U.K., a cross-demographic shift to social with these tools in place would mean newcomers could be turned off immediately by the digital litter and abandon Foursquare altogether. For Foursquare to take hold in the U.K. will require a base of superusers who can make changes to locations easily, reporting, policing and editing venues as needed. More at the link.