Sep
07

A Culture Emerges

by Feedback

At Feedback we are constantly exploring various demographic and geographic differences as they pertain to our clients. As a part of that, we also explore the various channels these audiences prefer, shun or flourish in at a given time.

There’s been quite a bit of chatter surrounding Twitter demographics and ethicity, however uncomfortable broaching the topic may be. One of the most interesting statistics to come out of it all are the levels of African American users on Twitter, because the figures are so disproportional to the overall U.S. representation.

A study done by Pew indicated that as of May 2011, 25 percent of African-Americans use Twitter as compared to 19 percent of Hispanics and only 9 percent of whites (note: these figures reflect the percentages of Americans as a whole who use Twitter, and not the actual makeup of the service, which is about half white and a quarter black).

A humorous but factual presentation by The Onion’s digital director, Baratunde Thurston – bluntly titled “How to be Black Online” – noted that while less than half of African-Americans have high-speed Internet at home, they dominate mobile broadband usage – nearly double that of their white counterparts. And the ease of Twitter (140 characters or less to update) and access to other people within the service makes it popular for use on mobile devices.

And lastly, a study suggested that Twitter adoption among African-Americans was based on the finding that they are more likely to have a greater interest than other ethnic groups in celebrity and gossip news. And thanks to the fall of MySpace, Twitter has become the online outlet of choice for celebrity drama. Plus, you can shout at them.

In my opinion, it’s the age of user as opposed to race that might be most indicative of how people are using Twitter.

The younger generations (teens and young twentysomethings) of Caucasians, African-Americans, Latinos, and others generally use Twitter as a public instant messenger. It’s more conversational than Facebook, and they can not only message their friends, but also tweet celebrities and read their tweets in real-time. Like Myspace, users can also personalize their pages with colors, designs, and different backgrounds.

Thurston also makes mention of the Twitter trending topics that dominate many evening chats (such as, #thingshoodratslove, #ghettohurricanenames, or #waystogetoffthephone) in the U.S., referring to them as, “blacktags.” It’s even a subject that has entered the halls of academia. From Slate:

Brendan Meeder thinks he’s got a good hypothesis about what’s going on. Meeder, a Ph.D. student at Carnegie Mellon University, has downloaded the tweets of more than 100 million users. (Twitter gave him special permission to do so for research purposes.) He’s been probing this collection to see how Twitter users interact with one another; he’s particularly interested in how trends begin and spread through a social network.

While analyzing his database a few months ago, Meeder noticed something strange—he found a cluster of hundreds of users whose profiles were connected to one another. When he looked up the users, he noticed that a lot of them were black. It’s in exactly these kinds of tight-knit groups that Twitter memes flourish, Meeder says.

“It’s my impression that these hashtags start in dense communities—people who are highly connected to each other,” Meeder says. “If you have 50 of these people talking about it, think about the number of outsiders who follow at least one of those 50—it’s pretty high at that point. So you can actually get a pretty big network effect by having high density.”

These kinds of bonds are obviously not unique to social media – rather, these are cultural distinctions we are merely seeing reflected inside. The nation’s African American community is finding its voice and community on the web, and that platform of choice is increasingly looking like Twitter.

In coming months, we’ll explore ethnicity, age and other personal traits and how different cultures interact online.

-Brittany (@britgary)

Photo credit:

Jan
14

What Makes an Online Community Click?

by Feedback

A couple years ago, I joined up with an online community that essentially dedicated its entire use of social media to humor writing. Mostly on Twitter, sure, but this group has creative endeavors outside the service – editors at legitimate news services, TV writers, cartoonists, ad copywriters, bloggers, authors. Most are in a creative career of some kind; others are simply cube warriors longing for an absurdist, 140-character escape.

This community has grown over the years, and what has come out of it are real-life friendships, serious relationships, business partnerships, and all the negative and positive things that develop from human interaction.

Yet every time I look at what has made this community grow and glue together (or tear apart in places, as any community will do) has been the concept of feedback, and I don’t use that term simply because that’s the name of this company. You can trace this mini society back to a site called Favrd. Now defunct, Favrd essentially turned Twitter’s “favorites” starring feature into a button that said “That’s funny.” If a tweet made you laugh, you starred it. Favrd collected these stars, then ranked the funniest tweets of the day onto a leaderboard (the site was eventually gamed by a few bad apples and taken down by the creator after all sorts of drama, but that’s a different story). But it was addicting: You wanted to know which jokes worked, which ones didn’t, and who liked it. And then you got to know the people who liked your jokes.

Point, please? A successful online community – one where people congeal together, interact, learn and share – must have such a “liking” feature, or some form of feedback that will keep people coming back again and again. It’s a concept that those of us in the public relations and mass communications industries should take to heart. In fact, you can probably track the beginnings of Facebook’s meteoric rise to 500 million to the February 2009 introduction of the “Like” feature. That was really the first time, aside from typing comments, that the site really allowed its users to give instantaneous feedback.

Of course, this concept of “liking” isn’t new, and it’s not found in the latest social media darlings. Stock traders give feedback and get their comments ranked on Nasdaq.com’s social networking service. Think feedback methods in fantasy football, online role-playing games, Digg, Reddit, or even simple message boards. Think about it: Feedback keeps people coming back to a website or mobile service again and again.

The key is creating a place where people can be effectively rewarded.

For an online community to work, and to keep people coming back to it, it must be able to offer feedback. All the successful websites today feed on the human psyche: The one thing anyone wants is to be accepted, to be loved, liked, hearted, starred, whatever term you choose. In a successful community, online or otherwise, this must be a constant.

-Jeff (@jephkelley)

Nov
09

LET’S MAKE A DEAL… WEBSITE!

by Feedback

Let me start off by saying that I’ve been meaning to write this post for weeks, if not months.  I first heard of Groupon while visiting family in the Hampton Roads area and looked it up to see if there was something similar for Richmond.  It had yet to launch in either location, but at least the publicity had started in Tidewater.  It’s such a simple concept at its foundation: Buy with friends, everyone saves.  My first thought was pooling money in college to rent a van for a weekend trip to the beach or camping.  But clearly, Groupon has always been about something bigger.  By the time it launched in Richmond, I had begun to see and hear about it everywhere.   Daily emails from Advertising Age, articles in USA Today and the Wall Street Journal, even the TV news magazine Nightline (embedded below) were all doing features on the group buying phenomenon.  For those of you who don’t follow along with those resources, here’s the story.

Groupon was founded by Andrew Mason, now 29, a musician by trade, who was doing web design work with a Chicago serial entrepreneur by the name of Eric Lefkofsky before accepting a scholarship to pursue a Master’s degree in public policy from the prestigious Harris School at the University of Chicago.  The engine behind Groupon was developed as part of a fundraising site called The Point, where people could pledge donations to a cause, but not be charged until the pre-established goal was met.  The site attracted a wide range of non-profits, but ultimately, Mason’s desire to monetize the project lead him away from charity and towards collective buying.  And thus, Groupon was born in November 2008.

The ‘cult of Groupon’, as detractors have called it, developed rapidly.  Mason told Nightline that they started with just seven employees, but has since grown into the old Montgomery Ward headquarters in Chicago’s River North district, with a workforce of several hundreds.  The product seems so obvious: One great deal, every day, in your inbox.  Like The Point, when a pre-determined sales figure is reached, the deal is on.  Groupon and the deal-offering business split the proceeds.

Naturally, with such stunning success and an easily replicated concept, Groupon has inspired myriad imitators. LivingSocial.com In Richmond, in particular, LivingSocial seemed to launch at the exact same time.  Established sites like Yelp have gotten in on the act, while one-time Internet titan AOL has also set aside a URL for a similar project at Wow.com.  Even the largest retailer in the world, Walmart, is looking for a piece of the action: it Wow.comdebuted a feature called Crowdsaver on its Facebook page that offers a low-priced offering based on consumer demand as demonstrated by the amount of “Likes” a deal receives.  Facebook itself will surely get in on the action soon.

With two years of dizzying success under their belts, as well as a boatload of revenue and investment cash, Groupon seems adamant to maintain its position, aggressively buying up clones around both the country and the world.  A nationwide offering from the Gap that broadened the otherwise locally-focused business model attracted almost a half million individual sales.  You can expect similar deals to follow.  Meanwhile, the imitators who don’t sell out will seek to distinguish themselves, perhaps with added gaming elements or rewards for repeat buyers.  For many consumers still fighting the effects of the economic downturn, the prevalence of such deal sites is a breath of fresh air.

As always, I appreciate your comments and questions.  Find me on Twitter or feel free to email me: Thomas AT feedbackagency DOT com

-Thomas (@thomasmcdonald)

Aug
18

Everything In Its Right Place? Facebook Places

by Feedback

Some things are simply inevitable.

The sun will come up.

Charles Barkley will say something unintentionally hilarious.

Facebook will emulate what it doesn’t buy.

On the latter point, Wednesday evening Facebook debuted Places. The premise and execution of Facebook Places is remarkably similar to the first two sentences anyone may use to describe any number of check-in applications: It’s a way to share your actual location with others online; it also allows you to observe where others have checked in. Where many other applications seek to go from that starter definition, be it MyTown with games, Foursquare with tips, Gowalla with stickers, or ShopKick with deals, Facebook has simply stopped limply (but maybe effectively) at the first point of entry.

There’s a few other tricks to Facebook Places, and the following video, dripping with a sincerity that suggests they have suddenly figured out something others haven’t, demonstrates them:

Also inevitable is that Walt Mossberg of the Wall Street Journal will be given a test run before most other humans. Unlike his usually predictably estatic review of Apple products (generally done in time for Steve Jobs to use an actual Mossberg quote as a part of his Keynote presentations), Walt was actually a bit matter-of-fact about Facebook Places. Not cold or harsh, just… well, “Meh” would probably be the most effusive meta-adjective I’d use.

This is because what may become the most short-term-advantageous thing about Places is what it does for others, including those other check-in services. The APIs that could come streaming out could hook into and help fuel the growth of any number of companies Facebook as threatened or tried to buy recently, several of whom (Gowalla, Foursquare and Yelp) actually appeared in some form on stage with Facebook for Places’ debut. And yes, businesses can claim their “Place” via a Page as we and others mused months ago.

And what about long-term? Well you can better believe Facebook didn’t debut this to merely dip a toe in. Cross-platform geo-location ads, sacks of data on visitations and total domination of the “place” space is clearly a mid-term goal. Actual quote from Zuckerberg: “…certainly you can imagine these things in the future.”

We have been recently musing on the concept of “place” (including, “How Location Could Change The Future of Pages” last March) insofar as the web toys with tying itself to real-world geographies and the inherent opportunity and fear laden in those watching this wrestling match happen. But one thing we’ve always said about Facebook — their nearest, truest competitor in a spiritual sense was never MySpace, but Windows. They want to be the start, constant and end of the web for many people — the entry point in. And for many, they are. So now marry location ontop of that and you can begin to see how powerful they could become for the general public. For and to the general public, I should say. Being in Facebook, as a valid location that people actually visit in real life as well as “Like” could become the equivalent of having your name and address in the phone book in the 80′s and being a store that’s in the Mall. You want to be “seen” there- and now you can, by friends who aren’t even nearby to see you.

This, of course, begs the privacy question. But if we rest for a moment and assume that this is about who you allow to see your location, we can hopefully still talk about “place” and Facebook’s role in it in a rational fashion. I could choose to not tell a single friend where I was on Facebook and still find it incredibly valuable to know that a restaurant I hear about in Richmond, VA called “Strange Matter” has been visited by several of my friends, I could reference it in a Status Update and get real recommendations of what to eat there and tips such as bringing your own quarters for the vintage arcade games. 3/4 of that scenario already happened pre-Places, but now I could potentially verify that it’s a cool place that several of my less chatty friends have also patronized recently. It becomes an early indicator for me in a single search, allowing me then to pursue more info through other means (Yelp reviews, call-outs for other recommendations on Twitter, etc.).

Facebook Places doesn’t change the game as much as it does solidify it, make it whole and, likely, make it ubiquitous. What it does more than really innovate is fire a cannon in a battle previously fought by slingshots as it brings its half-a-billion active audience into the check-in game. But don’t be distracted by the battle to see whose or what type of check-in system wins. Instead, start to look ahead, with us, at what this will mean for the intersection of real and web location in the years ahead.

-Dean (@dbrowell)

UPDATED August 19, 2010: Not that Facebook Places is available in #RVA just yet. #Fail #FacebookPlaces, #Fail.

One last note: Notice that Places logo? As TechCrunch points out: “It’s a 4. In a Square. Yeah.

Jul
29

Facebook Questions: Details, Advantages & Institutional Concerns

by Feedback

This week Facebook launched, “Facebook Questions” to a limited number of users. In essence the Questions service easily posts a public question from the same spot you might normally post a basic update. A question using Questions is completely public, although answers will likely contain responses by both Friends and non-Friends.

As AllFacebook.com explains,

“Right now the product will only be launched to a beta group, however Questions will be rolled out based on how the beta test performs. There are a number of significant features within questions that are not provided by competing services (i.e. Quora). For example, users will be able to add photos to a question, create polls, and browse through questions based on categories. One other substantial feature that many Page administrators will welcome, is the ability to ask questions directly from a Facebook Page.”

The addition also meant a slightly re-worked publishing tool for users posting status updates, links, etc. While not normally a very big deal, some rightly point out that the simple status update or wall-writing (even on someone else’s) now requires two clicks before posting, which could impact the number of posts.

What does this mean for institutions such as healthcare, higher education?

The answer is first not to be afraid of new features, but be mindful of how they could be used.

The change will be advantageous for institutions keen on engaging audiences by allowing a Page to ask open-ended questions as it normally might, only in a more visible medium as the questions will appear in the public repository, not just on your Facebook Page.

The most obvious concern for many will be how the general public uses it to poll their friends and beyond for decisions, possibly slanting their Questions obviously to the positive or negative. Where currently a Facebook user might simply post on their wall, “I just moved to Chicago, where should I take my toddler for her first checkup, anyone recommend a doctor?”, this question now can now be posed to a waiting public who may answer with verbosity. Or, when in shopping mode for institutions of higher education, a teen who has narrowed their choices might poll openly which of the two or three they should attend.

This last point should also signal an opportunity, however. Here is your chance to demonstrate thought leadership and ANSWER questions as well.

How Facebook Questions challenges general sites such as Quora, or industry-specific sites such as WebMD’s Exchanges, only time will tell.

Some rightly note that many of the Questions being asked right now as it launches in beta are all about Facebook and Facebook Questions.

Questions will be an interesting animal to watch from a monitoring standpoint as we judge adoption levels.

-Dean (@dbrowell)

Jun
29

Yelp & Healthcare: Sittin’ In a Tree?

by Feedback

Wondering aloud: Do people go to Yelp to research healthcare, or are they simply encountering Yelp reviews for non-retail/restaurant in searches?

As with all we do at Feedback, we start by examining the local culture of social media use first – because not all regions are alike (not by a longshot). In a recent study of a particular large region we saw relatively heavy use of Yelp in providing reviews of healthcare. We observed service-line specific reviews as well as general hospital comments. Obviously it varies by community, but it does beg the question that if you have heavy Yelp use in your town for other things, that even a minimal number of reviews could get high visibility. Plus, their system of reviewer ranks means the reviews have a high trust factor.

We don’t recommend putting too much or too little emphasis on any particular channel until you’ve done a thorough review and deep dive that helps you make strategic, informed decisions.

So what does everyone think about this?

We’ve spoken about Yelp before here on the Feedback blog, but we felt this was an important question. Feel free to email us at contact [at] feedbackagency.com with your thoughts.

-Dean (@dbrowell)

Jun
24

Facebook & The Search For Meaning / Meaning for Search

by Feedback

A must-read article, “Facebook Unleashes Open Graph Search Engine, Declares War On Google” from AllFacebook.com shows how the search worm is turning inside of Facebook, with the importance of “Like” rising as a key variable in search — at least inside of Facebook. This is dreadfully important as a concept.

This very change, as small and undramatic as it has been incorporated, provides a fantastic look into the future of search and the contextual web. Consider how the open display of credibility and validation will change how we find information. We already see the results of that, in theory, in how search already plays out. We assume that the relevance determined by the wizard behind the Google curtain with every click of a “search” button.

Is there an assumed trust that all of those people who find this useful or like something are being sincere and are for real? Certainly, just as we assume when we search now that what appears first is truly relevant (paid ads aside – not that the first unpaid ad hasn’t ostensibly paid to be listed high via optimizing, etc.). AllFacebook.com wonders aloud about “like baiting” as well, but in some ways that still feels less nefarious than engineering a page that has no business showing up so high in a ranking to appear first, even if it actually has no relevance– a practice that happens every day in our typical search.

But then imagine how the actual display of the relevance, such as number of likes, incorporates the, “Is This Review Useful”-ization of the web. In some ways it’s fundementally taking the algorithm away from tinkerers and into the hands of motivated consumers — for good or ill. (And I’m not saying this is a good or bad thing, just fascinated that and how it’s happening.) Facebook wants to create a “social semantic search engine” that essentially runs off of the interactions of people as relevance fuel, not meta data tricks. This very urge and their platform and critical mass of interactions in which to try it means we will have a lot to chew on in the near future as the underpinnings of information display in search give way to new supports.

Google’s caching Tweets and displaying in some first searches. Facebook is listing by Like. Where will we be next year as sentiment creeps not just into our results, but into the algorithm itself?

-Dean (@dbrowell)

May
03

The Internet, Anthropology, Facebook as Training Wheels & More at ROFLcon II

by Feedback

We’ve returned from ROFLcon II (April 30 & May 1, 2010) and are eager to share all we learned with anyone who will listen…

Huge ideas abound and it was an incredibly helpful (and dare we say important) conference to witness. It was only the second time in two years they’d even held this exploration of internet culture, memes, academia and society at MIT. Anna (first-timer) and I (returning for round two) soaked up every minute of the packed two days. There’s so much to share, but we wanted to be sure to get some key themes in writing first:

  • The entire conference started out with Ethan Zuckerman’s (The Berkman Center for Internet and Society) brilliant “From Weird to Wide” primer on important philosophical questions about culture, the internet and memes. This included not only a bright debut of Kenyan’s first meme explosion, but also an important discussion of a significant point: Be an anthropologist, not a bouncer. In other words, embrace rather than exclude. It would set the tone for some interesting underpinnings for the rest of the conference
  • Apparently the rest of The Internet agrees that YouTube comments are the most ridiculous in the universe
  • Another giant point writ large: Know your history. There were many great moments in a variety of panels that included memes and networks old and new, but the overall one can’t be hyped enough: know where we’ve been. For example, the open community of Usenet, with its challenges, imperfections, sub-communities, stalwart user trust and very existence pre-AOL set the stage for one of the toughest but singularly important lessons of the entire conference…
  • “AOL” and “Training Wheels.” The Tweets heard round the world. As the very last panel at ROFLcon II tried to wrap its arms around the topic of “Mainstreaming the Web,” Ben Huh and Moot (from LOLcats and 4chan fame, respectively) deftly created a distinct separation between the open sub-communities that operate online (some anonymously) and those that allow for a mainstream audience to operate in a larger but closed system. With over 950 attendees, ROFLcon included employees from ominous internet giants such as Google and Mozilla, but as this panel pointed out, not a soul from Facebook (or none that would admit it). This lead to the single most Re-Tweeted line from the conference, uttered by Ben:

“Facebook has become like AOL, it’s like training wheels for the internet. It’s a safe place, except for your privacy.”

And thus what was once considered a fringe medium was correctly pegged as having moved into a mainstream culture controlled by a single corporation. We’ve been here before. With 400 million users, with meaningful proportions of diverse generations, races and cultures, Facebook is not unlike the closed system of AOL. This doesn’t make it right or wrong, but it does make it everywhere and closed – and drastically different from much of the sub-cultures brewing away contently in the rest of the web.

For Feedback one overriding point was clear: the social web hardly, barely begins and ends at the doors of Facebook and Twitter. Certainly a critical mass at those two giants means we must implement there to reach a large population of consumer. But even more importantly we must dive deep, see fewer obstacles and research even smarter and harder beyond these barriers into the sub-cultures that exist in the interest, cultural and geographic communities. There are enough self-proclaimed social media gods to take care of staring at Facebook and Twitter only. But it’s not unlike marveling only at a capital city and not noticing the swarms of people outside, down the roads, in other states, in other countries… The future of the net and community is not only also out there, it may indeed only be out there. Think I’m just being overly dramatic? Ask AOL.

More to come on some of our favorite moments by myself and Anna (@alucas9). We certainly had fun too and some photos are up on our Facebook Page right now. In the meantime be sure to check out her interview with Christian Lander of “Stuff White People Like” fame.

-Dean (@dbrowell)